|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity imaging systems rely on hardware image signal processing (ISP) pipelines. These low-level pipelines consist of a sequence of processing blocks that, depending on their hyperparameters, reconstruct a color image from RAW sensor measurements. Hardware ISP hyperparameters have a complex interaction with the output image, and therefore with the downstream application ingesting these images. Traditionally, ISPs are manually tuned in isolation by imaging experts without an end-to-end objective. Very recently, ISPs have been optimized with 1st-order methods that require differentiable approximations of the hardware ISP. Departing from such approximations, we present a hardware-in-the-loop method that directly optimizes hardware image processing pipelines for end-to-end domainspecific losses by solving a nonlinear multi-objective optimization problem with a novel 0th-order stochastic solver directly interfaced with the hardware ISP. We validate the proposed method with recent hardware ISPs and 2D object detection, segmentation, and human viewing as end-to-end downstream tasks. For automotive 2D object detection, the proposed method outperforms manual expert tuning by 30% mean average precision (mAP) and recent methods using ISP approximations by 18% mAP.
Ali Mosleh,
Avinash Sharma,
Emmanuel Onzon,
Fahim Mannan,
Nicolas Robidoux,
Felix Heide Hardware-in-the-loop End-to-end Optimization of Camera Image Processing Pipelines CVPR 2020 (Oral) |
|
|
Automotive object detection on KITTI using [1]
The imagees obtained with hyperparameters optimized with the proposed hardware-in-the-loop method have a lower perceptual quality compared to those obtained with the ISP optimized for perceptual quality, however, more cars are correctly detected. |
|
Default ISP Hyperparameters
|
ISP Optimized for Perceptual Image Quality
|
Hardware-in-the-loop End-to-end Optimization (this work)
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|||||||
|
Instance segmentation on COCO using [3]
While the task-specific-optimized ISP do not achieve the same perceptual quality as the one optimized for perceptual image quality, it substantially improves the downstream image understanding task. |
|
Hyperparameter Optimization of Hardware ISPs on Captured RAW Data |
||||||||||
|
Default ISP Hyperparameters
|
Expert-tuned ISP Hyperparameters for Perceptual Image Quality
|
End-to-end ISP Optimization with ISP Approximation from Tseng et al. [4]
|
Hardware-in-the-loop ISP End-to-end Optimization (this paper)
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive object detection using [1] on real-world Sony IMX249 captures processed with the ARM Mali-C71 hardware ISP.
The proposed hardware-in-the-loop end-to-end detection loss optimization approach outperforms default ISP hyperparameters, ISP expert-tuned for perceptual image quality, and ISP optimized using a differentiable approximation [4]. |
|
Hyperparameter Optimization of Hardware ISPs for Perceptual Image Quality |
|
Expert Manually Tuned ISP Hyperparameters
|
ISP Optimized for Perceptual Image Quality using ISP Approximation Approach [4]
|
ISP Optimized for Perceptual Image Quality using the Proposed Hardware-in-the-loop End-to-end Optimization
|
||||
|
|
|
|
AR0231AT CMOS sensor captures processed with the OnSemi AP0202AT hardware ISP for perceptual image quality.
The proposed hardware-in-the-loop optimization approach outperforms default ISP hyperparameters, and ISP optimized using a differentiable approximation [4]. |