Princeton University
Computer Science Dept.

Computer Science 291
Put Your Title/Topic Here

Your Name Here


Introduction

This is where you should lay out what sort of issues/web sites you'll be discussing in this web page. You should give a very brief overview of the issue such as "The Child Online Protection Act was first discussed in 19XX. It was intended to blah blah blah. Because of reasons x, y, and z, it was declared unconstitutonal by the ?? appellate court in 19YY. This led to the creation of the second Child Online Protection Act...etc." This introduction should probably be a paragraph or two long and should help the reader become acquainted with the basic facts of the issue.

Relevant Links

Here you should have a short statement or two describing the links you have found; something like "Below are some links relating to the Child Online Protection Act. These links have been grouped by their stance on the issue." These links should then be subgrouped in some way that is useful to the reader. Each link should have a nice description of the site. This is where the objective descriptions should come in. I've stolen the following links from the April 12th edition of Yahoo!'s "Picks of the Week," but obviously your sites should be relevant to the topic at hand.

Example Grouping 1: Groups in Favor of the Child Online Protection Act

Example Grouping 2: Groups Against the Child Online Protection Act

Personal Opinion (You should put a better heading here)

Here is where you should, in one to two paragraphs, state your own personal opinion about the issue and why. For example, "I feel the Child Online Protection Act is a bad idea because blah blah blah." As part of the defense of your idea, it would be a very good idea to cite arguments made in the websites you've just listed above. If you are still fundamentally undecided about an issue, it's okay to say that, too. Just say something like "The correct position on this issue is still unclear to me. Pro COPA advocates make compelling arguments x, y, and z. However, Anti COPA advocates raise the equally powerful arguments a, b, and c."


yourEmailAlias@princeton.edu